California Pulls Styrofoam Ban

Citing the country's economic conditions, California legislators have tabled Assembly Bill 1358 before it was due for a vote. The bill would have made California the first state to ban Styrofoam food containers.

There are already more than 20 cities in the Golden State that have outlawed Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) food containers. Styrofoam is a trademarked EPS product and is commonly used in take-out containers and coffee cups.

Because it is so light (comprised of 98 percent air) it is easily carried by wind and water currents to all reaches of our planet. Its unsinkable nature makes it a main component of marine debris. Photo:

Because it is so light (comprised of 98 percent air) it is easily carried by wind and water currents to all reaches of our planet. Photo:

Assemblyman Jerry Hill pulled the bill from consideration, fearing a loss of jobs for California EPS manufacturers. The bill also had opposition from industry groups including the American Chemistry Council, the American Forest and Paper Association and the California Restaurant Association.

While EPS is often less expensive than other food containers such as cardboard, it is an end product meaning it can only be recycled into more Styrofoam. Recent research has found that a bacteria found in beetles can break down Styrofoam, but in a landfill it will typically break into smaller pieces instead of decompose.

For food containers, it's difficult to find recycling options in the first place. Cardboard containers that come in contact with oils are generally not recyclable because oil can't be removed during the recycling process. Many programs that accept plastic will only accept it in bottle form, which would restrict non-Styrofoam plastic food containers.

Latest posts by Trey Granger (see all)

  • Tim Dunn

    We make styrofoam products that biodegrade at no great extra cost. We can do this with all of the plastics used in disposable products. Unlike corn based plastics, our products don’t worsen the third world hunger problem. Essentially, the advocates of PLA (corn plastic,) ask that we ignore the world hunger problem, throw away a portion of the petroleum and natural gas that is a byproduct of refining fuel, and pay a great deal more for an inferior plastic. PLA only makes sense if you don’t understand its ramifications. See .