In a September 2009 speech to Congress, President Obama discussed the changes he envisions for citizens with and without health insurance. Under his proposed universal health care plan, he says insurance companies would no longer be able to refuse coverage to the ill, and patients will not be expected to pay out of pocket for expensive treatments or vital operations.
But the health care industry is not one grounded on ecological principles. In fact, it is one of the single most polluting industries in the country. American hospitals generate approximately 6,600 tons of waste daily. As much as 85 percent of that is non-hazardous solid waste, such as paper, cardboard, food waste, metal, glass and plastics, according to Practice Green Health.
Experts says because the current environmental problems in health care institutions were not taken into closer consideration when creating this type of legislation, it may not be possible to immediately gauge the ecological pros and cons of the bill.
The Alliance for Natural Health (ANH), an international campaign that champions natural health over a reliance on pharmaceutical drugs, is one organization that is becoming increasingly aware of the importance of the sustainability side of health care.
A self-proclaimed pioneer of this newfound field, ANH defines sustainable health care as “a complex system of interacting approaches to the restoration, management and optimization of human health that has an ecological base, that is environmentally, economically and socially viable indefinitely, that works harmoniously both with the human body and the non-human environment, and which does not cause any significant unfair or disproportionate effects which may hinder the functioning, development or viability of the health care system itself.”
While ANH has a progressive outlook on the health care industry, Executive and Scientific Director Dr. Robert Verkerk has a less than optimistic opinion of the potential environmental impact universal health care could have.
“Health care has huge implications for the environment as it stands. It represents the single largest industry in the United States. Running hospitals, doctors’ clinics and the massive associated insurance and pharmaceutical industries is the single largest burden on the environment,” he says.
“Current health care costs run the vicinity of $7,000 per person. Some analysts say ‘Obama-care’ will increase this two-fold. Unless we see a radical rethink towards sustainable and natural bio-compatible approaches to health care, something Obama-care could have – but hasn’t – embraced, then this means twice the CO2 emissions, twice the pollution and twice the waste disposal problems.”
Verkerk says the only way to create a truly sustainable health care system is to revert back to our ecological roots and “better maintain health equilibrium when subjected to natural processes.”
This means incorporating high-quality foods and healthy lifestyles, elements that Verkerk says the medical community has been “banging on about for years now.”
Anna Gilmore Hall, executive director of Health Care Without Harm, an international team of hospitals, medical professionals, community groups, labor unions and health care systems, agrees that the new plan will have a significant impact as more people will have more access to health care, an issue that the government has yet to address.
“The new legislation will help bring lifesaving services to more people, with correspondingly increased pollution. As 16 percent of the GDP, health care is a large contributor to environmental pollution in the United States,” Hall says.
“We need more research into the contribution to disease from environmental pollutants – for example, from off-gassing of paints, cleaners and construction materials, from chemicals and from carbon emissions from our use of fossil fuels,” she adds.
But while Hall says many hospitals have already set in place sustainable operations, they still need leadership from lawmakers and elected representatives to make an environmental standard a national priority.
However, the health care plan does include some initiatives that could prove sustainable if implemented correctly.
The plan will eliminate the need for duplicate files. Less paperwork means less of an impact on the environment, at least in theory. The new system will make use of a centralized database where doctors will be able to extract the necessary information in order to decrease the risk of mistaken treatments or misdiagnoses.
In connection with the idea of a centralized database, Obama wants doctors to begin practicing medicine “offensively” instead of spending time and energy on preoccupation with insurance companies and legal matters. Oftentimes, unnecessary steps are taken to treat a patient, including the frequent “abuse” of X-ray and MRI machines, which lead to more trashed paper from insurance forms and medical reports.
Also, the legislation offers the Exchange program, which will enable people living in the U.S. to compare insurance plans and select the best features at a competitive, low-cost price.
But while these plans aim to reduce the amount of paper-pushing in hospitals and clinics across the country, organizations such as Health Care Without Harm still believe Obama is tackling health care legislation from the wrong angle.
“Efficiencies such as accounting and administrative costs may be achieved through universal health care,” Hall says. “However, as long as primary prevention is not addressed, and our society continues to focus on managing chronic disease rather than preventing it, the health care system will remain expensive and will not see large reductions in costs.”